A Study of the Supervision of the Foreign Market Development Program, Foreign Agricultural Service
Author: Alfred D. Ulvog
Publisher:
Published: 1982
Total Pages: 116
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: Alfred D. Ulvog
Publisher:
Published: 1982
Total Pages: 116
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1999
Total Pages:
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThe Foreign Market Development Program (FMD), also known as the cooperator program, is administered by the Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) of the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The goal of the program is to develop, maintain, and expand long-term export markets for U.S. agricultural products.
Author: United States. Foreign Agricultural Service
Publisher:
Published: 1961
Total Pages: 16
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Alfred D. Ulvog
Publisher:
Published: 1982
Total Pages: 0
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
Published: 1987
Total Pages: 60
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Department of Agriculture
Publisher:
Published: 1980
Total Pages: 44
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Joint Task Force of the U.S. Dept. of Agriculture and the State Universities and Land Grant Colleges
Publisher:
Published: 1969
Total Pages: 42
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
Published: 1990
Total Pages: 60
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Agriculture. Subcommittee on Rural Development, Research, Biotechnology, and Foreign Agriculture
Publisher:
Published: 2011
Total Pages: 108
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. General Accounting Office
Publisher:
Published: 1987
Total Pages: 54
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKIn response to a congressional request, GAO reviewed the effectiveness of the cooperator programs that the Department of Agriculture's (USDA) Foreign Agricultural Service (FAS) implemented to develop, maintain, and expand foreign markets for U.S. agricultural commodities. GAO found that FAS has: (1) allowed cooperators to implement numerous and varied long-term programs and has placed few restrictions on the funding a cooperator can receive for a program; (2) not established criteria to help cooperators focus on opportunities for market development or expansion; (3) not critically assessed program results; (4) failed to evaluate programs sufficiently to determine which market development activities were effective or which needed refinement or termination; (5) established guidelines that encourage, but do not require, cooperators to contribute annual amounts equal to FAS funds; and (6) defined cash, goods, and services contributions inaccurately, conveying the impression that cooperators participated more fully in financing marketing activities than they actually did.