The United States Government Printing Office (GPO) was created in June 1860, and is an agency of the U.S. federal government based in Washington D.C. The office prints documents produced by and for the federal government, including Congress, the Supreme Court, the Executive Office of the President and other executive departments, and independent agencies. A hearing is a meeting of the Senate, House, joint or certain Government committee that is open to the public so that they can listen in on the opinions of the legislation. Hearings can also be held to explore certain topics or a current issue. It typically takes between two months up to two years to be published. This is one of those hearings.
Witnesses: Christopher Edley, Jr., prof., Harvard Law School; Jonathan P. Hiatt, general counsel, AFL-CIO, Wash., DC; Samuel J. Heyman, chmn. and ceo, GAF Corp., Wayne, NJ; Karen Kerrigan, chmn., Small Business Survival Committee, Wash., DC; Richard Middleton, Jr., pres., Assoc. of Trial Lawyers of Amer., Wash., DC; Conrad Mallett, chmn., Coalition for Asbestos Resolution, Wash., DC; Michael D. Green, prof. of law, Univ. of Iowa College of Law, Iowa City, IA; Richard A Nagareda, assoc. prof. of law, Univ. of Georgia School of Law, Athens, GA; and Paul Verkuil, dean, Benjamin Cardozo School of Law, New York, NY.
Of the report of the Judicial Conference Ad Hoc Committee on Asbestos Litigation -- Report of the Judicial Conference Ad Hoc Committee on Asbestos Litigation -- Separate dissenting statement of Judge Thomas F. Hogan to report of the Judicial Conference Ad Hoc Committee on Asbestos Litigation.
This paper, an edited transcript of written testimony delivered in October 1991 to the Courts and Judicial Administration Subcommittee, United States House Judiciary Committee, summarizes the scope of asbestos litigation in the United States, the response of the civil justice system to date, and the obstacles to efficient and equitable resolution of asbestos-related personal injury claims. An equitable and efficient national solution to the asbestos litigation problem will have to demonstrate sensitivity to the past history of asbestos litigation, cope with the current crush of claims and include a strategy for responding to future claims. Most important, the success of any solution will depend on a realistic assessment of the number and type of future asbestos-related claims.