An Essay on the Origin, Progress and Establishment of National Society
Author: John Shebbeare
Publisher:
Published: 1776
Total Pages: 214
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: John Shebbeare
Publisher:
Published: 1776
Total Pages: 214
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Krannert Library
Publisher:
Published: 1979
Total Pages: 376
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: New York Public Library. Reference Department
Publisher:
Published: 1961
Total Pages: 996
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: John Phillip Reid
Publisher: Univ of Wisconsin Press
Published: 1986
Total Pages: 524
ISBN-13: 9780299130701
DOWNLOAD EBOOKBrilliantly executed....Reid's central argument is reserved for his contentions about how the American Revolution occurred within the British constitutional framework. Crucial is his assertion that the eighteenth-century British constitution itself was a vital crossroad between the old constitution of 'customary powers, with rights secured as property' and the newer constitution 'of sovereign command and of arbitrary parliamentary supremacy.' The conflict between the two was profound and ultimately irreconcilable as the Americans, with occasional misgivings and uncertainties, sustained the old and Parliament lurched toward the new...This book (has) a compelling intellectual force that deserves the closest scrutiny.' -George M. Curtis III, American Historical Review
Author: George Godfrey Cunningham
Publisher:
Published: 1863
Total Pages: 818
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: New York Public Library. Research Libraries
Publisher:
Published: 1979
Total Pages: 586
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: George Godfrey Cunningham
Publisher:
Published: 1837
Total Pages: 512
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: George Godfrey Cunningham
Publisher:
Published: 1853
Total Pages: 518
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Allen Oscar Hansen
Publisher: New York : Macmillan
Published: 1926
Total Pages: 360
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Annelien De Dijn
Publisher: Harvard University Press
Published: 2020-08-25
Total Pages: 433
ISBN-13: 0674988337
DOWNLOAD EBOOKWinner of the PROSE Award An NRC Handelsblad Best Book of the Year “Ambitious and impressive...At a time when the very survival of both freedom and democracy seems uncertain, books like this are more important than ever.” —The Nation “Helps explain how partisans on both the right and the left can claim to be protectors of liberty, yet hold radically different understandings of its meaning...This deeply informed history of an idea has the potential to combat political polarization.” —Publishers Weekly “Ambitious and bold, this book will have an enormous impact on how we think about the place of freedom in the Western tradition.” —Samuel Moyn, author of Not Enough “Brings remarkable clarity to a big and messy subject...New insights and hard-hitting conclusions about the resistance to democracy make this essential reading for anyone interested in the roots of our current dilemmas.” —Lynn Hunt, author of History: Why It Matters For centuries people in the West identified freedom with the ability to exercise control over the way in which they were governed. The equation of liberty with restraints on state power—what most people today associate with freedom—was a deliberate and dramatic rupture with long-established ways of thinking. So what triggered this fateful reversal? In a masterful and surprising reappraisal of more than two thousand years of Western thinking about freedom, Annelien de Dijn argues that this was not the natural outcome of such secular trends as the growth of religious tolerance or the creation of market societies. Rather, it was propelled by an antidemocratic backlash following the French and American Revolutions. The notion that freedom is best preserved by shrinking the sphere of government was not invented by the revolutionaries who created our modern democracies—it was first conceived by their critics and opponents. De Dijn shows that far from following in the path of early American patriots, today’s critics of “big government” owe more to the counterrevolutionaries who tried to undo their work.