Long-Term Effects of Super Heavy-Weight Vehicles on Bridges

Long-Term Effects of Super Heavy-Weight Vehicles on Bridges

Author: Scott M. Wood

Publisher: Purdue University Press

Published: 2007-04-01

Total Pages: 480

ISBN-13: 9781622601189

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

A permit truck which exceeds the predefined limit of 108 kips is defined as a superload in Indiana. This study was conducted to examine the long-term effects of superload trucks on the performance of typical slab-on-girder bridges and to assess the likelihood of causing immediate damage. Typical steel and prestressed concrete slab-on-girder type bridges were analyzed using both beam line analysis and detailed finite element models. Furthermore, one prestressed concrete bridge and one steel bridge were instrumented using more than 50 sensors each. Strains and deflections were measured during a live load test, and each bridge was monitored for more than six months. Capacities of the investigated bridges were calculated and compared with the demands generated by various groupings of typical superload trucks. Analysis of the steel and prestressed concrete bridges demonstrated that typical superload trucks up to a gross vehicle weight of 500 kips are not expected to cause any damage or impair the long term performance of the investigated bridges. Serviceability limit states of the prestressed concrete bridges controlled the rating, and the bridges had adequate strength to accommodate all superloads included in the database. However, strength limit states controlled the rating of steel bridges. Long term monitoring of a continuous and a simple span bridge indicated that strains comparable to those of a 366-kip superload truck can be generated by regular truck traffic. The field measurements also demonstrated that the in-service behavior was different than the design assumptions. Furthermore, the AASHTO girder distribution factor equation was found to be conservative for the investigated bridges. Use of a more accurate method such as FEA or the spring analogy method is recommended for the evaluation of bridges traversed by very heavy superload trucks.


Bulb-T Girder Bridge Barrier Effect on Live Load Distribution

Bulb-T Girder Bridge Barrier Effect on Live Load Distribution

Author: Tal Stricker

Publisher:

Published: 2008

Total Pages:

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

ABSTRACT: Bulb-T girder bridges are composed of precast, prestressed concrete beams with a reinforced concrete slab. Typically, the slab extends transversely beyond the exterior beam, and there is a traffic barrier on the edge. The bridges are designed for dead and live loads and prestressing effects. For the live loads, the transverse distribution of moment and shear load effects to interior and exterior girders is determined by using equations in the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) Load and Resistance Factor Design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specifications. These equations give the designer a factor, which is then multiplied by the moment or shear load effect determined by a line analysis. The equations assume that barriers are not present. The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Structures Research Lab has made field measurements on a Bulb-T bridge, both before and after the barriers were placed, due to a truck loaded with blocks. For this project, this data was analyzed to determine the barrier's effect on the live load distribution. The results of this project may be used to determine if load ratings can be improved by consideration of the barrier effect, which can be done as a Posting Avoidance (Exception) technique.


Overload Permit Procedures

Overload Permit Procedures

Author: James S. Noel

Publisher:

Published: 1992

Total Pages: 64

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

An analytical study of H15 bridges in Texas has resulted in an improved procedure for issuing overweight truck permits. Single and multiple axle limits, specifically to protest pavements rather than bridges, are assumed. The weight restrictions limit any (and all) axle groups as a function of the gage and tire contact widths. The restrictions were derived to assure that the maximum stress in any bridge member never exceeds the operating level. Only one vehicle is allowed on the bridge at a time but it is assumed to be traveling at a speed such that the full impact allowance is generated.


Live-load Distribution on Glued-laminated Timber Girder Bridges

Live-load Distribution on Glued-laminated Timber Girder Bridges

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 23

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Increased use of timber bridges in the U.S. transportation system has required additional research to improve the current design methodology of these bridges. For this reason, the U.S. Forest Service, Forest Products Laboratory (FPL), and the Federal Highway Administration have supported several research programs to attain the objective listed above. This report is a result of a study sponsored by the FPL, with the objective of determining how highway truckloads are distributed to girders of a glued-laminated timber bridge. The American Association of State Highway and Transportation Official (AASHTO) load and resistance factor design (LRFD) Bridge Design Specification provides live-load distribution provisions for glued-laminated girder timber bridges that were used in previous AASHTO Specifications. The AASHTO live-load distribution provisions were reviewed in this report. Field-test results were used to review the current AASHTO LRFD glued-laminated timber girder bridge-design specifications and to validate analytical results obtained by finite-element analyses. With the validated analytical models, parametric studies were performed to determine the worst-case live-load distribution factors that can be used to calculate the design moment and shear for glued-laminated timber girders. Simplified live-load distribution equations that can be used to determine these distribution factors were developed and are provided in this report. These equations take into account how load is distributed to the bridge girders, considering the effects of span length, girder spacing, and clear width of the bridge.