Proceedings are reported of a symposium held in Dayton, sponsored by the Flight Dynamics Laboratory during 2-5 March 1982. The symposium was planned and ran by the Flight Control Division, specifically the Flying Qualities Group and the Control Techniques Group as part of an ongoing effort to revise and upgrade both MIL-F-8785C, Military Specification, Flying Qualities of Piloted Airplanes, and MIL-F-9490D, Flight Control System-Design, Installation and Test of Piloted Aircraft, General Specification For. Specialists from both the flying qualities and flight control system disciplines were gathered in Dayton from both industry and government agencies. Formal and informal presentations, plus workshop discussions, were structured around proposed draft versions of the new Flying Qualities MIL-Standard and Handbook and the new Flight Control Systems MIL-Specification and Handbook. This report contains a record of the presentations and discussions as submitted by the individual authors.
Proceedings are reported of a symposium held in Dayton, sponsored by the Flight Dynamics Laboratory during 2-5 March 1982. The symposium was planned and ran by the Flight Control Division, specifically the Flying Qualities Group and the Control Techniques Group as part of an ongoing effort to revise and upgrade both MIL-F-8785C, Military Specification, Flying Qualities of Piloted Airplanes, and MIL-F-9490D, Flight Control System-Design, Installation and Test of Piloted Aircraft, General Specification For. Specialists from both the flying qualities and flight control system disciplines were gathered in Dayton from both industry and government agencies. Formal and informal presentations, plus workshop discussions, were structured around proposed draft versions of the new Flying Qualities MIL-Standard and Handbook and the new Flight Control Systems MIL-Specification and Handbook. This report contains a record of the presentations and discussions as submitted by the individual authors.
The second edition of Flight Stability and Automatic Control presents an organized introduction to the useful and relevant topics necessary for a flight stability and controls course. Not only is this text presented at the appropriate mathematical level, it also features standard terminology and nomenclature, along with expanded coverage of classical control theory, autopilot designs, and modern control theory. Through the use of extensive examples, problems, and historical notes, author Robert Nelson develops a concise and vital text for aircraft flight stability and control or flight dynamics courses.
A study was conducted to design an experimental flight test program for the Total In-Flight Simulator CTIFS) directed toward the interface between flying qualities requirements and flight control system design criteria. The eventual goal is to provide an interpretation or translation of flying qualities requirements for use by the flight control system designer. Specifically, an angle of attack and pitch rate command system matrix involving both short term and long term dynamics are specified for evaluation. A major objective of the research was to demonstrate that flying qualities criteria and flight control system configuration or architecture can be independent. Finally, additional configurations are proposed to evaluate the efficacy of dynamic decoupling.
Flight Mechanics Modeling and Analysis comprehensively covers flight mechanics and flight dynamics using a systems approach. This book focuses on applied mathematics and control theory in its discussion of flight mechanics to build a strong foundation for solving design and control problems in the areas of flight simulation and flight data analysis. The second edition has been expanded to include two new chapters and coverage of aeroservoelastic topics and engineering mechanics, presenting more concepts of flight control and aircraft parameter estimation. This book is intended for senior undergraduate aerospace students taking Aircraft Mechanics, Flight Dynamics & Controls, and Flight Mechanics courses. It will also be of interest to research students and R&D project-scientists of the same disciplines. Including end-of-chapter exercises and illustrative examples with a MATLAB®-based approach, this book also includes a Solutions Manual and Figure Slides for adopting instructors. Features: • Covers flight mechanics, flight simulation, flight testing, flight control, and aeroservoelasticity. • Features artificial neural network- and fuzzy logic-based aspects in modeling and analysis of flight mechanics systems: aircraft parameter estimation and reconfiguration of control. • Focuses on a systems-based approach. • Includes two new chapters, numerical simulation examples with MATLAB®-based implementations, and end-of-chapter exercises. • Includes a Solutions Manual and Figure Slides for adopting instructors.
Ride quality is becoming an important area of concern in the acceptability of an aircraft. This has led to considering the use of active structural mode control systems on present and future aircraft to obtain acceptable ride quality. Although ride quality criteria are available, these criteria have not included considerations of mode control system effects and performance. This report extends the suggested criteria of a previous report to include the effects of an active structural mode control system. It is shown how the criteria as applied to separate vertical and lateral systems may be used in the design of a single system which controls both the vertical and lateral axes simultaneously.
The #1 guide to understanding the "why and how" of fly-by-wire flight control systems. This book is an approachable and easily understandable must-read for aviation professionals! Why don't new aircraft designs allow the pilots a mechanical control connection? This book explains how fly-by-wire fixes the top 5 problems with mechanical controls for high performance aircraft. Rather than describe a particular aircraft’s design with confusing acronyms, readers will get a "behind the scenes" understanding for the critical concepts that apply to any modern aircraft. Because these design principles are easily described and understood, readers of this book will be armed with knowledge as they approach their flight manual procedures. Including: - Problems with mechanical flight controls - Advantages of fly-by-wire - How and why can fly-by-wire control systems fail? - Why are four computers better than one or two? - Explanations of the control laws used by business jets, fighters, and airliners - What sensors are needed, and how the system maintains control when sensors are lost - Design considerations for risk mitigation in case of component failures Buy this book to read on your next layover!
This SAE Aerospace Recommended Practice (ARP) provides design guidelines for aircraft mechanical control systems and components. Topics contained in this document include design requirements, system design and installation guidelines, and component design practices for primary flight controls, secondary flight controls, and utility controls. This document has been revised, following a Five-Year Review process, for the following reasons: To introduce additional design topics, To clarify or improve the contents as required, and To correct editorial errors found in the original issue.
Lists citations with abstracts for aerospace related reports obtained from world wide sources and announces documents that have recently been entered into the NASA Scientific and Technical Information Database.
Aircraft operating as so-called High Altitude Platform Systems (HAPS) have been considered as a complementary technology to satellites since several years. These aircraft can be used for similar communication and monitoring tasks while operating at a fraction of the cost. Such concepts have been successfully tested. Those include the AeroVironment Helios and the Airbus Zephyr, with an endurance of nearly 624 hours (26 days). All these HAPS aircraft have a high-aspect-ratio wing using lightweight construction. In gusty atmosphere, this results in high bending moments and high structural loads, which can lead to overloads. Aircraft crashes, for example from Google’s Solara 50 or Facebook’s Aquila give proof of that fact. Especially in the troposphere, where the active weather takes place, gust loads occur, which can lead to the destruction of the structure. The Airbus Zephyr, the only HAPS aircraft without flight accidents, provides only a very small payload. Thus it does not fully comply with the requirements for future HAPS aircraft. To overcome the shortcomings of such single-wing aircraft, so-called multibody aircraft are considered to be an alternative. The concept assumes multiple aircraft connected to each other at their wingtips. It goes back to the German engineer Dr. Vogt. In the United States, shortly after the end of World War II, he experimented with the coupling of manned aircraft. This resulted in a high-aspect-ratio wing for the aircraft formation. The range of the formation could be increased correspondingly. The engineer Geoffrey S. Sommer took up Vogt’s idea and patented an aircraft configuration consisting of several unmanned aerial vehicles coupled at their wingtips. However, the patent does not provide any insight into the flight performance, the flight mechanical modeling or the control of such an aircraft. Single publications exist that deal with the performance of coupled aircraft. A profound, complete analysis, however, is missing so far. This is where the present work starts. For the first time, a flying vehicle based on the concept of the multibody aircraft will be analyzed in terms of flight mechanics and flight control. In a performance analysis, the aircraft concept is analyzed in detail and the benefits in terms of bending moments and flight performance are clearly highlighted. Limits for operation in flight are shown considering aerodynamic optimal points. The joints at the wingtips allow a roll and pitch motion of the individual aircraft. This results in additional degrees of freedom for the design through the implementation of different relative pitch and bank angles. For example, using individual pitch angles for individual aircraft further decreases the induced drag and increases flight performance. Because the lift is distributed symmetrically, but not homogenously along the wingspan, a lateral trim of the individual aircraft in formation flight becomes necessary. The thesis presents a new method to implement this trim by moving the battery mass along half the wingspan, which avoids additional parasite drag. Further, a complete flight dynamics model is provided and analyzed for aircraft that are mechanically connected at their wingtips. To study this model in detail, a hypothetical torsional and bending spring between the aircraft is introduced. If the spring constants are very high, the flight dynamics model has properties similar to those of an elastic aircraft. Rigid-body and formation eigenmotions can be clearly distinguished. If the spring constants are reduced towards zero, which represents the case of the multibody aircraft, classical flight mechanics eigenmotions and modes resulting from the additional degrees of freedom are coupled. This affects the eigenstructure of the aircraft. Hence, normal motions with respect to the inertial space as known from a rigid aircraft cannot be observed anymore. The plant also reveals unstable behavior. Using the non-linear flight dynamics model, flight controllers are designed to stabilize the plant and provide the aircraft with an eigenstructure similar to conventional aircraft. Different controller design methods are used. The flight controller shall further maintain a determined shape of the flight formation, it shall control flight, bank and pitch angles, and it shall suppress disturbances. Flight control theories in the time domain (Eigenstructure assignment) and in the frequency domain (H-infinity loop-shaping) are considered. The resulting inner-control loops yield a multibody aircraft behavior that is similar to the one of a rigid aircraft. For the outer-control loops, classical autopilot concepts are applied. Overall, the flight trajectory of the multibody aircraft above ground is controlled and, thus, an actual operation as HAPS is possible. In the last step, the flight controller is successfully validated in non-linear simulations with complete flight dynamics. Flugzeuge in der Form von sogenannten Höhenplattformen (engl. High-Altitude Platform Systems, HAPS) werden seit einigen Jahren als kostengünstige Ergänzung zu teuren Satelliten betrachtet. Diese Flugzeuge können für ähnliche Kommunikations- und überwachungsaufgaben eingesetzt werden. Zu den gegenwärtigen Konzepten solcher Fluggeräte, die bereits erfolgreich im Flugversuch eingesetzt wurden, zählen der Helios von AeroVironment und der Airbus Zephyr, der eine Flugdauer von fast 624 Stunden (26 Tagen) erreicht hat. Alle diese HAPS-Flugzeuge besitzen einen Flügel langer Streckung, der in Leichtbauweise konstruiert ist. Hieraus resultieren in böiger Atmosphäre hohe Biegemomente und starke strukturelle Belastungen, die zu überbelastungen führen können. Flugunfälle beispielsweise von Googles Solara 50 oder Facebooks Aquila belegen dies. Insbesondere in der Troposphäre, in der das aktive Wetter stattfindet, treten Böenlasten auf, die die Struktur zerstören können. Der Airbus Zephyr, der bisher als einziges HAPS-Flugzeug frei von Flugunfällen ist, besitzt nur eine sehr geringe Nutzlast. Daher kann er die Anforderungen an zukünftige HAPS-Flugzeuge nicht vollständig erfüllen. Um die Schwachstellen solcher Ein-Flügel-Konzepte zu überwinden, wird in dieser Arbeit ein alternatives Flugzeugkonzept betrachtet, das als Mehrkörperflugzeug bezeichnet wird. Das Konzept geht von mehreren, an den Flügelspitzen miteinander verbundenen Flugzeugen aus und beruht auf Ideen des deutschen Ingenieurs Dr. Vogt. Dieser hatte in den USA kurz nach Ende des Zweiten Weltkrieges bemannte Flugzeuge aneinanderkoppeln lassen. Hierdurch ergab sich ein Flugzeugverbund mit einem Flügel langer Streckung. Damit konnte die Reichweite des Verbundes gesteigert werden. Geoffrey S. Sommer griff die Idee von Vogt auf und lies sich eine Flugzeugkonfiguration patentieren, die aus mehreren, unbemannten Flugzeugen besteht, die an den Enden der Tragflächen miteinander gekoppelt sind. Die Patentschrift gibt jedoch keinen Einblick in die Flugleistungen, die flugmechanische Modellierung oder die Regelung eines solchen Fluggerätes. Vereinzelt existieren Veröffentlichungen, die sich mit den Flugleistungen von gekoppelten Luftfahrzeugen beschäftigen. Eine tiefgreifende, vollständige flugmechanische Analyse fehlt jedoch bisher. Hier setzt die vorliegende Arbeit an. Ein Fluggerät basierend auf dem Konzept des Mehrkörperflug-zeugs wird erstmalig hinsichtlich der Flugmechanik und Flugregelung untersucht. In einer Flugleistungsbetrachtung wird das Flugzeugkonzept genau analysiert und die Vorteile hinsichtlich der Biegemomente und der Flugleistungen klar herausgestellt. Die Grenzen des Einsatzes im Flugbetrieb werden mithilfe aerodynamischer Optimalpunkte aufgezeigt. über die Lager an den Flügelspitzen, die eine relative Roll- und Nickbewegung der Flugzeuge untereinander ermöglichen, ergeben sich durch die Einstellung unterschiedlicher Längslage- und Hängewinkel zusätzliche Freiheitsgerade im Entwurf. Die Verwendung unterschiedlicher Nicklagewinkel der einzelnen Flugzeuge reduziert beispielsweise den induzierten Widerstand weiter und steigert die Flugleistung. Durch die symmetrische, entlang der Spannweite jedoch nicht homogene Auftriebsverteilung ist auch eine laterale Trimmung der einzelnen Flugzeuge in der Formation notwendig. Hier stellt die Arbeit eine neuartige Möglichkeit vor, um diese Trimmung ohne zusätzlichen parasitären Widerstand mittels Verschiebung der Batteriemasse entlang der Halbspannweite umzusetzen. Weiterhin wird ein vollständiges flugdynamisches Modell für über mechanische Lager verbundene Luftfahrzeuge aufgestellt und analysiert. Für diese Analyse wird eine hypothetische Torsions- und Biegefeder zwischen den Flugzeugen modelliert. Sind die Federsteifigkeiten hinreichend hoch, besitzt das flugdynamische Modell Eigenschaften, die einem elastischen Flugzeug entsprechen. Starrkörper- und elastische Eigenbewegungsformen sind in diesem Fall klar separiert. Bei immer weiterer Reduzierung, bis auf eine Federsteifigkeit von Null, kommt es zu Kopplungen zwischen den klassischen, flugmechanischen Eigenbewegungsformen und den Moden aus den zusätzlichen Freiheitsgraden. Dies stellt den Auslegungsfall für das Mehrkörperflugzeug dar. Hierbei verändert sich die Eigenstruktur (engl. eigenstructure) des Flugzeugs und normale, bei einem starren Flugzeug beobachtbare Bewegungen gegenüber dem inertialen Raum sind nicht mehr erkennbar. Zusätzlich zeigt die Strecke instabiles Verhalten. Basierend auf dem nichtlinearen, flugdynamischen Modell werden mit verschiedenen Methoden Regler entworfen, die die Regelstrecke stabilisieren und dem Flugzeug eine Streckenstruktur zuweisen, die derjenigen klassischer Flugzeuge ähnelt. Zudem soll durch die Regler eine vorgegebene Form des Flugzeugverbundes beibehalten werden, die Fahrt, der Längs- und Rolllagewinkel sollen geregelt und Störungen unterdrückt werden. Als Auslegungsverfahren werden Theorien der Zustandsregelungen im Zeitbereich (Eigenstrukturvorgabe) und Frequenzbereich (H-infinity loop-shaping) verwendet. Hierdurch wird durch die inneren Regelschleifen ein Verhalten des Mehrkörperflugzeugs erzielt, das dem eines starren Flugzeugs entspricht. Für die äußeren Regelschleifen werden anschließend klassische Konzepte von Autopiloten verwendet. Im Ergebnis ist eine Regelung des Flugweges über Grund des Mehrkörperflugzeugs und somit ein tatsächlicher Betrieb als HAPS möglich. Die Funktionalität des Reglers wird abschließend in nichtlinearen Simulationen mit vollständiger Flugdynamik verifiziert.
