An Analysis of the Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS) Processes of the Military Services Within the Department of Defense

An Analysis of the Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS) Processes of the Military Services Within the Department of Defense

Author: Joseph S. Snook

Publisher:

Published: 1999-12-01

Total Pages: 96

ISBN-13: 9781423539827

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This thesis analyzes the current Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS) processes used in the military services. It will provide an upbasis for further study of PPBS. The thesis provides an overview of the PPBS at the Department of Defense level and describes the practices in place for the service. In each chapter there is an examination of the PPBS organization or corporate structure for the respective service. Additionally, each chapter examines the planning phase processes to develop the programming guidance. Next is a description of the Program Objectives Memorandum (POM) development and Budget Estimate Submission (BES) formulation. Following description of the practices for each of the services, there is a comparison. The comparison revealed two different methods being used by the services. The Army uses a decentralized approach for all inputs to the different processes. The Navy uses a decentralized approach for only the BES inputs and the Air Force uses a decentralized approach for only the POM input. The Marine Corps uses a centralized approach for all inputs. A centralized approach for review is used by all services, but at differing levels.


A Comparison of Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS) Practices of the Military Departments

A Comparison of Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS) Practices of the Military Departments

Author: Christopher M. Olson

Publisher:

Published: 1994

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This thesis examines the Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS) practices currently in place in the military departments of the Department of Defense. The thesis provides an overview of the PPBS at the Department of Defense level and then describes the current practices of the Departments of the Army, Navy (excluding the Marine Corps) and Air Force. In each chapter, there is first an examination of the PPBS organization of the respective department. Next, there is a focus on the conduct of the programming phase of the PPBS after delivery of the Defense Planning Guidance. Finally, there is a description of the budget phase, ending with the delivery of the approved Budget Estimate Submissions to the Office of the Secretary of Defense. After descriptions of the practices of each of the departments, there is a comparison of the programming phase practices and a comparison of the budgeting phase practices. The thesis does not examine the practices of the military departments in the planning phase as the planning phase is primarilary a Department of Defense function.


A Comparison of Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS) Practices of the Military Departments

A Comparison of Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS) Practices of the Military Departments

Author: Christopher M. Olson

Publisher:

Published: 1994

Total Pages: 68

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This thesis examines the Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS) practices currently in place in the military departments of the Department of Defense. The thesis provides an overview of the PPBS at the Department of Defense level and then describes the current practices of the Departments of the Army, Navy (excluding the Marine Corps) and Air Force. In each chapter, there is first an examination of the PPBS organization of the respective department. Next, there is a focus on the conduct of the programming phase of the PPBS after delivery of the Defense Planning Guidance. Finally, there is a description of the budget phase, ending with the delivery of the approved Budget Estimate Submissions to the Office of the Secretary of Defense. After descriptions of the practices of each of the departments, there is a comparison of the programming phase practices and a comparison of the budgeting phase practices. The thesis does not examine the practices of the military departments in the planning phase as the planning phase is primarilary a Department of Defense function.