Handbook of Engineering Practice of Materials and Corrosion
Handbook of Engineering Practice of Materials and Corrosion

Author: Jung-Chul (Thomas) Eun

Publisher: Springer Nature

Published: 2020-09-04

Total Pages: 885

ISBN-13: 3030364305

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This handbook is an in-depth guide to the practical aspects of materials and corrosion engineering in the energy and chemical industries. The book covers materials, corrosion, welding, heat treatment, coating, test and inspection, and mechanical design and integrity. A central focus is placed on industrial requirements, including codes, standards, regulations, and specifications that practicing material and corrosion engineers and technicians face in all roles and in all areas of responsibility. The comprehensive resource provides expert guidance on general corrosion mechanisms and recommends materials for the control and prevention of corrosion damage, and offers readers industry-tested best practices, rationales, and case studies.

Review of the Bureau of Reclamation's Corrosion Prevention Standards for Ductile Iron Pipe
Review of the Bureau of Reclamation's Corrosion Prevention Standards for Ductile Iron Pipe

Author: National Research Council

Publisher: National Academies Press

Published: 2009-12-19

Total Pages: 186

ISBN-13: 0309131634

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Ductile iron pipe (DIP) was introduced about 50 years ago as a more economical and better-performing product for water transmission and distribution. As with iron or steel pipes, DIP is subject to corrosion, the rate of which depends on the environment in which the pipe is placed. Corrosion mitigation protocols are employed to slow the corrosion process to an acceptable rate for the application. When to use corrosion mitigation systems, and which system, depends on the corrosivity of the soils in which the pipeline is buried. The Bureau of Reclamation's specification for DIP in highly corrosive soil has been contested by some as an overly stringent requirement, necessitating the pipe to be modified from its as-manufactured state and thereby adding unnecessary cost to a pipeline system. This book evaluates the specifications in question and presents findings and recommendations. Specifically, the authoring committee answers the following questions: Does polyethylene encasement with cathodic protection work on ductile iron pipe installed in highly corrosive soils? Will polyethylene encasement and cathodic protection reliably provide a minimum service life of 50 years? What possible alternative corrosion mitigation methods for DIP would provide a service life of 50 years?

Review of the Bureau of Reclamation's Corrosion Prevention Standards for Ductile Iron Pipe
Review of the Bureau of Reclamation's Corrosion Prevention Standards for Ductile Iron Pipe

Author: Committee on the Review of the Bureau of Reclamation's Corrosion Prevention Standards for Ductile Iron Pipe

Publisher:

Published: 2009-11-19

Total Pages: 186

ISBN-13: 9780309385039

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Ductile iron pipe (DIP) was introduced about 50 years ago as a more economical and better-performing product for water transmission and distribution. As with iron or steel pipes, DIP is subject to corrosion, the rate of which depends on the environment in which the pipe is placed. Corrosion mitigation protocols are employed to slow the corrosion process to an acceptable rate for the application. When to use corrosion mitigation systems, and which system, depends on the corrosivity of the soils in which the pipeline is buried. The Bureau of Reclamation's specification for DIP in highly corrosive soil has been contested by some as an overly stringent requirement, necessitating the pipe to be modified from its as-manufactured state and thereby adding unnecessary cost to a pipeline system. This book evaluates the specifications in question and presents findings and recommendations. Specifically, the authoring committee answers the following questions: Does polyethylene encasement with cathodic protection work on ductile iron pipe installed in highly corrosive soils? Will polyethylene encasement and cathodic protection reliably provide a minimum service life of 50 years? What possible alternative corrosion mitigation methods for DIP would provide a service life of 50 years?