Conference Before the United States Commission on Civil Rights
Author: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Publisher:
Published: 1961
Total Pages: 266
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Publisher:
Published: 1961
Total Pages: 266
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1962
Total Pages: 218
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Publisher:
Published: 1959
Total Pages: 688
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Publisher:
Published: 1961
Total Pages: 272
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Publisher:
Published: 1960
Total Pages: 944
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Publisher:
Published: 1979
Total Pages: 300
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Publisher:
Published: 1963
Total Pages: 280
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Publisher:
Published: 1974
Total Pages: 930
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Publisher:
Published: 2007
Total Pages: 196
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States Commission on Civil Rights
Publisher:
Published: 2008
Total Pages: 232
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKFrom Executive summary: This report focuses on the government's efforts to enforce federal civil rights laws prohibiting religious discrimination in the administration and management of federal and state prisons. Prisoners in federal and state institutions retain certain religious exercise rights under the Constitution and statutes including the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act (RLUPIPA), the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA), and the Civil rights of Institutionalized Persons Act (CRIPA). Many states have similar provisions in their state constitutions and in state law modeled on RFRA. These rights must be balanced with the legitimate concerns of prisons officials, including cost, staffing, and most importantly, prison safety and security. Reconciling these rights and concerns can be a significant challenge for penal institutions, as well as courts.