Compensation for Natural Resource Damages from Oil Spills

Compensation for Natural Resource Damages from Oil Spills

Author: Carol Adaire Jones

Publisher:

Published: 2013

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The basic measure of natural resource damages in USA environmental liability statutes is the cost of restoring the injured resources, plus compensation for the interim loss of resources from the time of injury until their full recovery. In contrast, until 1996, the international Convention Protocols addressing liability for accidental oil spills did not hold the responsible party liable for damages to natural resources, except to compensate for lost profits and earnings of commercial users of the resources. Recent developments, however, suggest international and USA laws are on paths toward convergence. In the 1996 regulations implementing the natural resource liability provisions of the USA Oil Pollution Act [OPA], natural resource damages are quantified as the costs of a Restoration Plan designed to return resources to baseline and to compensate for interim losses. The 1992 international Convention Protocols, which entered into force in May 1996, include the costs of resource "reinstatement" measures, though a clear definition of the scope of reinstatement has not yet been provided. A broad interpretation of "reinstatement", consistent with the restoration concepts in the OPA regulations, could provide an inclusive measure of damages for environmental harm. In section 2 of the paper, we discuss briefly the key features of the USA measure of damages. We then outline the international measure of damages and identify how it excludes losses incurred by members of the public -- for both market and non-market uses of resources. With this background, we present in section 3 an overview of key economic concepts for valuing the loss of public enjoyment of natural resources, which provides the analytic framework underlying the component of damages in USA law compensating for interim losses. In section 4, we briefly outline the OPA process for determining a restoration-based measure of damages, and in section 5 we outline approaches and methods for measuring the second component of the USA damage measure -- compensation for the interim loss of resources. The Appendix provides an example of the restoration-based approach from a recently settled mining waste case in Idaho.


2010 Oil Spill

2010 Oil Spill

Author: Kristina Alexander

Publisher: DIANE Publishing

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 18

ISBN-13: 1437940250

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This is a print on demand edition of a hard to find publication. The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill leaked an estimated 4.1 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, damaging the waters, shores, and marshes, and the fish and wildlife that live there. There is a process for assessing the damages to those natural resources and assigning responsibility for restoration to the parties responsible. BP was named the responsible party for the spill. The process allows Trustees of affected states and the fed. gov¿t. to determine the levels of harm and the appropriate remedies. Contents of this report: (1) Intro.: Statutory Authority; Trustees; Covered Natural Resources; Determination of Damages; (2) How the Process Works; (3) Restoration Options; Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund; Settlement vs. Litigation. Illus.


The 2010 Oil Spill: Natural Resource Damage Assessment Under the Oil Pollution Act

The 2010 Oil Spill: Natural Resource Damage Assessment Under the Oil Pollution Act

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 2010

Total Pages: 19

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The 2010 Deepwater Horizon oil spill leaked an estimated 4.1 million barrels of oil into the Gulf of Mexico, damaging the waters, shores, and marshes, and the fish and wildlife that live there. The Oil Pollution Act (OPA) establishes a process for assessing the damages to those natural resources and assigning responsibility for restoration to the parties responsible. BP was named the responsible party for the spill. The Natural Resources Damage Assessment (NRDA) process allows Trustees of affected states and the federal government (and Indian tribes and foreign governments, if applicable) to determine the levels of harm and the appropriate remedies. The types of damages that are recoverable include the cost of replacing or restoring the lost resource, the lost value of those resources if or until they are recovered, and any costs incurred in assessing the harm. Claims by individuals or businesses are not allowed, as all injuries are to the resources managed by state, federal, tribal, or foreign governments. OPA allows recovery from the responsible parties for harm resulting from response efforts, which in this case could include in situ burning, use of dispersants, and vehicle traffic on shores and marshes. The $20 billion escrow fund set up by BP in June 2010 is not for government NRDA claims, but it can be used to reimburse individual losses of subsistence use of natural resources, primarily lost fishing opportunities, which are covered by OPA.


Liability and Compensation Issues Raised by the 2010 Gulf Oil Spill

Liability and Compensation Issues Raised by the 2010 Gulf Oil Spill

Author: Jonathan L. Ramseur

Publisher: DIANE Publishing

Published: 2011-06

Total Pages: 27

ISBN-13: 143798343X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The 2010 Deepwater Horizon (DH) incident produced the largest oil spill that has occurred in U.S. waters, releasing more than 200 million gallons into the Gulf of Mexico. BP has estimated the combined oil spill costs will be approx. $41 billion. The DH oil spill raised many issues for policymakers, incl. the ability of the existing oil spill liability and compensation framework to respond to a catastrophic spill. Contents of this report: (1) Intro.; (2) Existing Liability and Compensation Framework: Responsible Party; Liability Limits; Financial Responsibility; The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund; Compensation or Claims Process; (3) Issues for Policymakers: Liability Limits; Per-Incident Cap; Level of Funding; Claims Process. This is a print on demand report.


The Use and Misuse of Science in Natural Resource Damage Assessment

The Use and Misuse of Science in Natural Resource Damage Assessment

Author: Gary S. Mauseth

Publisher:

Published: 1995

Total Pages: 68

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

"The Natural Resource Damage Assessment (NRDA) process generally followed in federal cases is intended to determine and quantify injury and related damages resulting from a pollution event, such as an oil spill. This paper reviews and comments on the fundamental issues raised by recent NRDA experiences and suggests way in which the process can be significantly improved. The paper also reviews regulations developed by the Department of the Interior (DOI) and the draft regulation proposed by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). Because NRDA is in large part fundamentally a scientific inquiry, the paper addresses the current difficulties, complexities, and constraints in applying the scientific method to real-time pollution events such as oil spills. In addition, these pollution events, in particular large oil spills, generate enormous public scrutiny, creating great political pressures on natural resource trustees and those named as responsible for the spill in determining natural resource damages based on uncertain data. A workable and reasonable NRDA result requires careful use of available scientific theory and information, which is frequently incomplete. The potential for resolution of NRDAs raises difficult issues of the proper use of science in the context of the confrontational process of litigation. Unfortunately, the NRDA process raises the prospect of the improper use of science-especially where data are not available or are inconclusive or scientific theory is not clearly established-as a tool of selective advocacy serving one side or another rather than the dispassionate search for truth. Various options for preventing the misuse of science are presented. The authors conclude that if the focus of all participants in the NRDA is the efficient and equitable determination of injury, damage and restoration of the environment where possible, the potential for misuse of science is minimized"--Abstract.


The Natural Resource Damage Assessment Deskbook

The Natural Resource Damage Assessment Deskbook

Author: Valerie Ann Lee

Publisher: Environmental Law Institute

Published: 2002

Total Pages: 330

ISBN-13: 9781585760404

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This book provides a comprehensive survey of the law and techniques associated with the law, science, and economics involved in natural resource damage assessment. Written by experts in the field, this new deskbook is the most comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of the subject available. It thoroughly examines the framework for liability and the goals of the federal statutes providing a right of action for natural resource damages. Focus is maintained on the natural resource damage provisions of CERCLA; the Oil Pollution Act; the Clean Water Act; the Marine Protection, Sanctuaries, and Research Act; and the National Park System Resource Protection Act.


Oil Spills: Cost of Major Spills May Impact Viability of Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund

Oil Spills: Cost of Major Spills May Impact Viability of Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund

Author: Susan A. Fleming

Publisher: DIANE Publishing

Published: 2010-10

Total Pages: 27

ISBN-13: 1437935117

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

On April 20, 2010, an explosion at the mobile offshore drilling unit Deepwater Horizon resulted in a massive oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico. The spill's total cost is unknown, but may result in considerable costs to the private sector, as well as federal, state, and local governments. The Oil Pollution Act of 1990 (OPA) set up a system that places the liability -- up to specified limits -- on the responsible party. The Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund (Fund), administered by the Coast Guard, pays for costs not paid for by the responsible party. This testimony focuses on: (1) how oil spills are paid for; (2) the factors that affect major oil spill costs; and (3) implications of major oil spill costs for the Fund. Charts and tables.