United States of America, Plaintiff, and the State of Indiana and the Environmental Management Board of the State of Indiana, Intervening Plaintiffs, V. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, V. Monsanto Company, Third Party Defendant, and the City of Bloomington, Indiana, the Utilities Service Board of Bloomington, Indiana, and Monroe County, Indiana, Plaintiffs, V. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Monsanto Company, Defendants

United States of America, Plaintiff, and the State of Indiana and the Environmental Management Board of the State of Indiana, Intervening Plaintiffs, V. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Defendant and Third Party Plaintiff, V. Monsanto Company, Third Party Defendant, and the City of Bloomington, Indiana, the Utilities Service Board of Bloomington, Indiana, and Monroe County, Indiana, Plaintiffs, V. Westinghouse Electric Corporation, Monsanto Company, Defendants

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1997

Total Pages: 12

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK


Seventh Circuit Digest

Seventh Circuit Digest

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1987

Total Pages: 730

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Includes: topical index alphabetical case index, federal rules index, and a synopsis section.


Stratospheric Ozone Damage and Legal Liability

Stratospheric Ozone Damage and Legal Liability

Author: Lisa Elges

Publisher: Routledge

Published: 2016-12-19

Total Pages: 194

ISBN-13: 1317234170

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

While government enforcement of laws and regulations to control the production of chloroflurocarbons in 1987 has been hailed as exemplifying the precautionary principle, for almost two decades US companies failed to take precautionary measures to prevent chemical emissions, despite the probable risk of stratospheric ozone loss. As a result, human harms in the form of skin cancer have reached epidemic proportions globally and in the United States where, today, one person dies every hour from skin cancer. This book reviews U.S. laws, regulations, and policies, as well as case law regarding similar toxic tort cases to consider whether companies can and should be held legally liable under tort common law theories and related tort justice theories for having contributed to increased risks of skin cancer.