Mr. Driggs, from the Committee on Invalid Pensions, Submitted the Following Report [to Accompany H. R. 3661.]
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1898
Total Pages: 2
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1898
Total Pages: 2
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1947
Total Pages: 748
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Superintendent of Documents
Publisher:
Published:
Total Pages: 2868
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. Secretary's Advisory Committee on Automated Personal Data Systems
Publisher:
Published: 1973
Total Pages: 396
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: C. Albert White
Publisher:
Published: 1983
Total Pages: 794
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: C.C. Baldwin
Publisher: Рипол Классик
Published: 1991
Total Pages: 989
ISBN-13: 5874721363
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1893
Total Pages: 888
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: John M. Curran
Publisher:
Published: 1919
Total Pages: 24
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Kansas. Legislature. Senate
Publisher:
Published: 1919
Total Pages: 784
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Kevin J. Coleman
Publisher: CreateSpace
Published: 2015-01-02
Total Pages: 32
ISBN-13: 9781505554328
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThe Voting Rights Act (VRA) was successfully challenged in a June 2013 case decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in Shelby County, Alabama v. Holder. The suit challenged the constitutionality of Sections 4 and 5 of the VRA, under which certain jurisdictions with a history of racial discrimination in voting-mostly in the South-were required to "pre-clear" changes to the election process with the Justice Department (the U.S. Attorney General) or the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The preclearance provision (Section 5) was based on a formula (Section 4) that considered voting practices and patterns in 1964, 1968, or 1972. At issue in Shelby County was whether Congress exceeded its constitutional authority when it reauthorized the VRA in 2006-with the existing formula-thereby infringing on the rights of the states. In its ruling, the Court struck down Section 4 as outdated and not "grounded in current conditions." As a consequence, Section 5 is intact, but inoperable, unless or until Congress prescribes a new Section 4 formula.