A Treatise on Judicial Evidence extracted from the manuscripts ... by M. Dumont. Translated into English
Author: Jeremy Bentham
Publisher:
Published: 1825
Total Pages: 390
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: Jeremy Bentham
Publisher:
Published: 1825
Total Pages: 390
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Jeremy Bentham
Publisher:
Published: 1825
Total Pages: 390
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: India
Publisher:
Published: 1907
Total Pages: 1134
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: India
Publisher:
Published: 1915
Total Pages: 1174
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Syed Ameer Ali
Publisher:
Published: 1898
Total Pages: 1646
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Signet Library (Great Britain)
Publisher: Edinburgh
Published: 1856
Total Pages: 288
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1856
Total Pages: 288
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Inns of Court (London). - Lincoln's Inn
Publisher:
Published: 1859
Total Pages: 988
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Signet Library (Great Britain)
Publisher:
Published: 1871
Total Pages: 632
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: William Twining
Publisher: Routledge
Published: 2017-09-08
Total Pages: 518
ISBN-13: 1351543768
DOWNLOAD EBOOKSome law students find jurisprudence daunting, impersonal, dry and seemingly detached from practical affairs. William Twining believes that many jurists have been fascinating people struggling with questions that are both historically significant and relevant to contemporary issues. This book brings together previously published essays that centre on three related themes: reading Juristic texts, the role of narrative in law, and relations between theory and practice. Building on a pragmatic view of jurisprudence, the author explores different ways of reading and using Juristic texts, to set them in context, to bring them to life and to engage with the reader's own concerns. He applies this approach to throw fresh light on four familiar figures - Holmes, Bentham, Hart and Llewellyn. Challenging limited agendas and parochial points of view, Twining outlines a programme for a broad approach to legal theory in the context of globalization. He satirizes some bad habits in jurisprudence and explores in depth how stories can be seductive vehicles for cheating in legal contexts, yet are essential for making sense of disputes about fact or law.