This edition summarizes developments in antitrust laws during 2004 in the courts, at the agencies, and in Congress, including three Supreme Court cases and three litigated merger cases.
Among other topics, the 2005 Annual Review discusses: - The Supreme Court's decision in Reeder-Simco, the Court's first R-P case in more than a decade; - The Sixth Circuit's Northwest Airlines decision remanding a predatory pricing case for trial; - Divergent court decisions upholding and condemning reverse payments patent litigation settlements; - FTC adjudicatory opinions addressing consummated mergers and price fixing; - FTC and DOJ appellate victories in joint venture, partial acquisition, and exclusive dealing cases; - Key court of appeals decisions discussing bankruptcy antitrust issues, the Illinois Brick co-conspirator exception, antitrust immunities, predatory overbidding, and class action and other procedural issues; - The court decision in Wal-Mart v. Visa approving the largest antitrust settlement in history; and more.
Antitrust Law Developments and its annual supplements have been recognized as the most authoritative and comprehensive research tools for practitioners, The 2003 Annual Review of Antitrust Law Developements surveys and describes all the significant developments during 2003.
This is the first annual supplement to Antitrust Law Developments (Fifth), a guide that surveys and describes all significant developments in antitrust law.
For over 37 years, Antitrust Law Developments and its annual supplements have been recognized as the single most authoritative and comprehensive set of research tools for antitrust practitioners. The 2009 Annual Review of Antitrust Law Developments summarizes developments during 2009 in the courts, at the agencies, and in Congress.
Antitrust is fast becoming a ’trending topic’, with over 120 countries having already adopted some form of competition legislation. This volume brings together carefully selected articles which reflect the evolution and progression of the regulation of joint conduct under competition law on both sides of the Atlantic, and which discuss principles of fundamental importance for antitrust law. The articles focus on various kinds of joint conduct between companies which might bear negative effects on competition, in particular on horizontal cartels and collusion between competitors. Attention is also paid to the debate surrounding the most adequate approach for vertical agreements, which take place between firms operating at different levels of production. Their effects on competition have traditionally been one of the most disputed issues in modern antitrust, and tend to divide the principal schools of thought that have influenced the evolution of competition policy around the world. The articles look primarily at two of the most established antitrust jurisdictions, namely the United States and the European Union. They discuss the general theoretical framework that has influenced the evolution of the law and policy; cover the most relevant practical developments; provide contrasting doctrinal views and pay particular attention to the main schools of thought that have influenced antitrust in the US and the EU; and are representative of the leading discussions in the course of antitrust history.