American National Standard

American National Standard

Author: American Nuclear Society. Standards Committee Working Group ANS-8.24

Publisher:

Published: 2017

Total Pages:

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

ANS 8.24-2017 provides requirements and recommendations for validation, including establishing applicability, of neutron transport calculational methods used in determining critical or subcritical conditions for nuclear criticality safety analyses.


Regulatory Guide

Regulatory Guide

Author: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Office of Standards Development

Publisher:

Published:

Total Pages: 1100

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Contents: 1. Power reactors.--2. Research and test reactors.--3. Fuels and materials facilities.--4. Environmental and siting.--5. Materials and plant protection.--6. Products.--7. Transportation.--8. Occupational health.--9. Antitrust reviews.--10. General.


Guide to Verification and Validation of the SCALE-4 Criticality Safety Software

Guide to Verification and Validation of the SCALE-4 Criticality Safety Software

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1996

Total Pages: 114

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Whenever a decision is made to newly install the SCALE nuclear criticality safety software on a computer system, the user should run a set of verification and validation (V & V) test cases to demonstrate that the software is properly installed and functioning correctly. This report is intended to serve as a guide for this V & V in that it specifies test cases to run and gives expected results. The report describes the V & V that has been performed for the nuclear criticality safety software in a version of SCALE-4. The verification problems specified by the code developers have been run, and the results compare favorably with those in the SCALE 4.2 baseline. The results reported in this document are from the SCALE 4.2P version which was run on an IBM RS/6000 workstation. These results verify that the SCALE-4 nuclear criticality safety software has been correctly installed and is functioning properly. A validation has been performed for KENO V.a utilizing the CSAS25 criticality sequence and the SCALE 27-group cross-section library for 233U, 235U, and 239Pu fissile, systems in a broad range of geometries and fissile fuel forms. The experimental models used for the validation were taken from three previous validations of KENO V.a. A statistical analysis of the calculated results was used to determine the average calculational bias and a subcritical k{sub eff} criteria for each class of systems validated. Included the statistical analysis is a means of estimating the margin of subcriticality in k{sub eff}. This validation demonstrates that KENO V.a and the 27-group library may be used for nuclear criticality safety computations provided the system being analyzed falls within the range of the experiments used in the validation.


WSRC Approach to Validation of Criticality Safety Computer Codes

WSRC Approach to Validation of Criticality Safety Computer Codes

Author:

Publisher:

Published: 1991

Total Pages: 11

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Recent hardware and operating system changes at Westinghouse Savannah River Site (WSRC) have necessitated review of the validation for JOSHUA criticality safety computer codes. As part of the planning for this effort, a policy for validation of JOSHUA and other criticality safety codes has been developed. This policy will be illustrated with the steps being taken at WSRC. The objective in validating a specific computational method is to reliably correlate its calculated neutron multiplication factor (K{sub eff}) with known values over a well-defined set of neutronic conditions. Said another way, such correlations should be: (1) repeatable; (2) demonstrated with defined confidence; and (3) identify the range of neutronic conditions (area of applicability) for which the correlations are valid. The general approach to validation of computational methods at WSRC must encompass a large number of diverse types of fissile material processes in different operations. Special problems are presented in validating computational methods when very few experiments are available (such as for enriched uranium systems with principal second isotope 236U). To cover all process conditions at WSRC, a broad validation approach has been used. Broad validation is based upon calculation of many experiments to span all possible ranges of reflection, nuclide concentrations, moderation ratios, etc. Narrow validation, in comparison, relies on calculations of a few experiments very near anticipated worst-case process conditions. The methods and problems of broad validation are discussed.