The Venezuelan Question and the Monroe Doctrine
Author: Charles Kendall Adams
Publisher:
Published: 1896
Total Pages: 36
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: Charles Kendall Adams
Publisher:
Published: 1896
Total Pages: 36
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Arthur Irwin Street
Publisher:
Published: 1895
Total Pages: 50
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: New York Chamber of Commerce. Committee on Foreign Commerce and the Revenue Laws
Publisher:
Published: 1896
Total Pages: 24
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: William Lindsay Scruggs
Publisher:
Published: 1896
Total Pages: 112
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Theodore Roosevelt
Publisher:
Published: 1999-01-01
Total Pages: 36
ISBN-13: 9780543693020
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThis Elibron Classics title is a reprint of the original edition published by the Government Printing Office in Washington, 1903.
Author: Samuel Guy Inman
Publisher:
Published: 1921
Total Pages: 54
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: John Bassett Moore
Publisher:
Published: 1906
Total Pages: 1066
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: J. Reuben Clark (Jr.)
Publisher:
Published: 1930
Total Pages: 270
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Christopher R. Rossi
Publisher: BRILL
Published: 2019-03-25
Total Pages: 283
ISBN-13: 9004379517
DOWNLOAD EBOOKInternational law’s turn to history in the Americas receives invigorated refreshment with Christopher Rossi’s adaptation of the insightful and inter-disciplinary teachings of the English School and Cambridge contextualists to problems of hemispheric methodology and historiography. Rossi sheds new light on abridgments of history and the propensity to construct and legitimize whiggish understandings of international law based on simplified tropes of liberal and postcolonial treatments of the Monroe Doctrine. Central to his story is the retelling of the Monroe Doctrine by its supreme early twentieth century interlocutor, Elihu Root and other like-minded internationalists. Rossi’s revival of whiggish international law cautions against the contemporary tendency to re-read history with both eyes cast on the ideological present as a justification for misperceived historical sequencing.