The Double Jeopardy Clause in the United States Constitution: an Historical Study of Its Origins and Meaning
Author: Irene E. Hansen
Publisher:
Published: 1961
Total Pages: 79
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: Irene E. Hansen
Publisher:
Published: 1961
Total Pages: 79
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: William Everett Hannon
Publisher:
Published: 1923
Total Pages: 24
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1929*
Total Pages: 18
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: John Wilder Syphax
Publisher:
Published: 1933
Total Pages: 109
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: David J. Bodenhamer
Publisher: Oxford University Press, USA
Published: 2007
Total Pages: 258
ISBN-13: 0195325672
DOWNLOAD EBOOK"This boxed set contains classroom resources to help America's educators teach about the most important documents in U.S. history"--Box
Author: United States. Department of Justice
Publisher:
Published: 1988
Total Pages:
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Charles Howard McIlwain
Publisher: The Lawbook Exchange, Ltd.
Published: 2005
Total Pages: 172
ISBN-13: 1584775505
DOWNLOAD EBOOKExamines of the rise of constitutionalism from the "democratic strands" in the works of Aristotle and Cicero through the transitional moment between the medieval and the modern eras.
Author: Larry M. Elison
Publisher:
Published: 2011
Total Pages: 282
ISBN-13: 0199778817
DOWNLOAD EBOOKMontana's state constitution was created during the early 1970s. Progressive, innovative and pragmatic, it combines a strong concern for individual rights, personal liberty, and individual dignity while seeking to keep government open and responsive to the will of the people of Montana. It also stresses rights to a clean and healthful environment. The Montana State Constitution is the first reference guide to offer an in-depth analysis of the state's constitutional history. In it, Larry Elison and Fritz Snyder provide the text of the constitution, its meaning, and its legal interpretations. It is an excellent research tool for those interested in Montana's constitutional history and case law, and it includes a comprehensive bibliographic essay dealing with available primary and secondary research sources. Previously published by Greenwood, this title has been brought back in to circulation by Oxford University Press with new verve. Re-printed with standardization of content organization in order to facilitate research across the series, this title, as with all titles in the series, is set to join the dynamic revision cycle of The Oxford Commentaries on the State Constitutions of the United States. The Oxford Commentaries on the State Constitutions of the United States is an important series that reflects a renewed international interest in constitutional history and provides expert insight into each of the 50 state constitutions. Each volume in this innovative series contains a historical overview of the state's constitutional development, a section-by-section analysis of its current constitution, and a comprehensive guide to further research. Under the expert editorship of Professor G. Alan Tarr, Director of the Center on State Constitutional Studies at Rutgers University, this series provides essential reference tools for understanding state constitutional law. Books in the series can be purchased individually or as part of a complete set, giving readers unmatched access to these important political documents.
Author: Goodwin Liu
Publisher: Oxford University Press
Published: 2010-08-05
Total Pages: 274
ISBN-13: 0199752834
DOWNLOAD EBOOKChief Justice John Marshall argued that a constitution "requires that only its great outlines should be marked [and] its important objects designated." Ours is "intended to endure for ages to come, and consequently, to be adapted to the various crises of human affairs." In recent years, Marshall's great truths have been challenged by proponents of originalism and strict construction. Such legal thinkers as Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia argue that the Constitution must be construed and applied as it was when the Framers wrote it. In Keeping Faith with the Constitution, three legal authorities make the case for Marshall's vision. They describe their approach as "constitutional fidelity"--not to how the Framers would have applied the Constitution, but to the text and principles of the Constitution itself. The original understanding of the text is one source of interpretation, but not the only one; to preserve the meaning and authority of the document, to keep it vital, applications of the Constitution must be shaped by precedent, historical experience, practical consequence, and societal change. The authors range across the history of constitutional interpretation to show how this approach has been the source of our greatest advances, from Brown v. Board of Education to the New Deal, from the Miranda decision to the expansion of women's rights. They delve into the complexities of voting rights, the malapportionment of legislative districts, speech freedoms, civil liberties and the War on Terror, and the evolution of checks and balances. The Constitution's framers could never have imagined DNA, global warming, or even women's equality. Yet these and many more realities shape our lives and outlook. Our Constitution will remain vital into our changing future, the authors write, if judges remain true to this rich tradition of adaptation and fidelity.