Incapacity Benefits and Pathways to Work

Incapacity Benefits and Pathways to Work

Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Work and Pensions Committee

Publisher: The Stationery Office

Published: 2006-05-06

Total Pages: 124

ISBN-13: 0215028694

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Committee's report examines the Government's proposals for welfare reform set out in its Green Paper 'A new deal for welfare: empowering people to work' (Cm 6730, ISBN 0101673027) published in January 2006. The proposed reforms are designed to help more ill or disabled people move into employment, thereby reducing the number of people claiming incapacity benefits by one million within a decade. Issues discussed include: the future rollout of the 'Pathways to Work' scheme; the introduction of a new benefit called Employment and Support Allowance (ESA) to replace incapacity benefit from 2008; support for ill or disabled people to move back into work; employer attitudes; the involvement of healthcare professionals; the role of the private and voluntary sectors; the costs and resources for the reform programme. The Committee welcomes the Government's aim to reform the welfare system in order to help support more ill or disabled people move back into work, but argues that if its reform programme is to be successful it will need adequate resources, particularly over the next few years, and further detailed work in co-operation with key stakeholders including employers and disability organisations.


Support to incapacity benefits claimants through Pathways to Work

Support to incapacity benefits claimants through Pathways to Work

Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Committee of Public Accounts

Publisher: The Stationery Office

Published: 2010-09-13

Total Pages: 48

ISBN-13: 9780215554611

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

During 2008-09, the Department for Work and Pensions (the Department) paid £12.6 billion in incapacity benefits to 2.6 million people who were unable to work because of disability or ill health. The Pathways to Work programme was launched nationally between 2005 and 2008 to help reduce the number of incapacity benefit claimants through targeted support and an earlier medical assessment. It is delivered by contractors in 60 per cent of districts, with Jobcentre Plus providing the service in the remainder. By March 2010, the programme had cost an estimated £760 million. The numbers on incapacity benefits reduced by 125,000 between 2005 and 2009 but the Pathways contribution to this reduction has been much more limited than planned. The programme was not well implemented. Pathways was introduced without effective piloting and rigorous evaluation of its likely impact. Early medical assessments appear to have had some success in moving people off incapacity benefits, although the Department does not monitor whether all these people move into work or onto other benefits. In other areas money has not been spent effectively. Private providers have seriously underperformed against their contracts and their success rates are worse than Jobcentre Plus. The Department should consider the evidence of the Committee's enquiries thoroughly before embarking on its new Work Programme. It should ensure good value for money by making good use of Jobcentre Plus resources and maintaining a sustainable balance between public, private and voluntary providers to allow proper competition and a good basis for comparing performance.


Support to incapacity benefits claimants through Pathways to Work

Support to incapacity benefits claimants through Pathways to Work

Author: Great Britain: National Audit Office

Publisher: The Stationery Office

Published: 2010-05-28

Total Pages: 38

ISBN-13: 9780102965223

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Reports on the Pathways to Work programme's aims to reduce the number of people claiming incapacity benefits and help them into work. This title suggests that it has had a limited impact and has turned out to provide poor value for money.


Annual Report

Annual Report

Author: National Institute of Economic and Social Research

Publisher:

Published: 2009

Total Pages: 40

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK


Too Sick to Work?

Too Sick to Work?

Author: Stamatia Devetzi

Publisher: Kluwer Law International B.V.

Published: 2011-01-01

Total Pages: 210

ISBN-13: 9041134263

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Revised versions of papers presented in June 2010 at a workshop in Fulda, Germany.


The role of incapacity benefit reassessment in helping claimants into employment

The role of incapacity benefit reassessment in helping claimants into employment

Author: Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: Work and Pensions Committee

Publisher: The Stationery Office

Published: 2011-07-26

Total Pages: 186

ISBN-13: 9780215560865

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The Work and Pensions Committee supports the Government's objectives for the incapacity benefit (IB) reassessment, which are to help people with disabilities and long-term health conditions to move back into employment, while continuing to provide adequate support for people who have limited capability for work or are unable to work. However, the report finds that the Government's positive messages about the IB reassessment are not getting through to the public. The report argues that that the Government should be more proactive in explaining its aims for the process and in emphasising the range of support which will be available. Current incapacity benefit claimants are being reassessed to decide whether they are able to work. The inquiry looked in detail at the Work Capability Assessment (WCA), the test which is used to assess whether an incapacity benefit claimant is capable of work, or work-related activity. WCAs are carried out by Atos Healthcare as part of a contract with the Department for Work and Pensions. It is widely accepted that the WCA was flawed, in the form in which it was introduced in 2008 for new ESA claimants, leading to a high proportion of inaccurate assessments and poor decisions by Jobcentre Plus. Many of these decisions were overturned at appeal. The report acknowledges that many welcome improvements have been made to the reassessment process as a result of the review by Professor Malcolm Harrington and the trial of the process carried out in Aberdeen and Burnley, before it was introduced nationally.