Report of the Commissioners of the Illinois State Penitentiary at Joliet
Author: Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet
Publisher:
Published: 1901
Total Pages: 98
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet
Publisher:
Published: 1901
Total Pages: 98
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Illinois State Penitentiary (Joliet, Ill.)
Publisher:
Published: 1901
Total Pages: 94
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Illinois State Penitentiary, Joliet
Publisher:
Published: 1903
Total Pages: 94
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Illinois State Penitentiary (Joliet, Ill.)
Publisher:
Published: 1867
Total Pages: 108
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Bureau of Labor
Publisher:
Published: 1906
Total Pages: 806
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1906
Total Pages: 806
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Illinois
Publisher:
Published: 1879
Total Pages: 982
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Illinois. General Assembly. Senate
Publisher:
Published: 1867
Total Pages: 586
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Illinois
Publisher:
Published: 1861
Total Pages: 1034
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Henry Kamerling
Publisher: University of Virginia Press
Published: 2017-11-28
Total Pages: 360
ISBN-13: 0813940567
DOWNLOAD EBOOKBoth in the popular imagination and in academic discourse, North and South are presented as fundamentally divergent penal systems in the aftermath of the Civil War, a difference mapped onto larger perceived cultural disparities between the two regions. The South’s post Civil War embrace of chain gangs and convict leasing occupies such a prominent position in the nation’s imagination that it has come to represent one of the region’s hallmark differences from the North. The regions are different, the argument goes, because they punish differently. Capital and Convict challenges this assumption by offering a comparative study of Illinois’s and South Carolina’s formal state penal systems in the fifty years after the Civil War. Henry Kamerling argues that although punishment was racially inflected both during Reconstruction and after, shared, nonracial factors defined both states' penal systems throughout this period. The similarities in the lived experiences of inmates in both states suggest that the popular focus on the racial characteristics of southern punishment has shielded us from an examination of important underlying factors that prove just as central—if not more so—in shaping the realities of crime and punishment throughout the United States.