[PDF] Full Reasons For Decision In The Matter Of Enbridge Southern Lights Gp Inc Download eBook

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Southern Lights GP Inc

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher:

Published: 2012

Total Pages: 60

ISBN-13:

On 31 May 2010, Enbridge Southern Lights GP Inc. (ESL), on behalf of Enbridge Southern Lights LP, and Enbridge Pipelines Inc. submitted NEB Tariff No. 1 and NEB Tariff No. 2 for service on the Southern Lights Pipeline to the National Energy Board (NEB). The Tariffs became effective on 1 July 2010, the pipeline's planned in-service date. Tariff No. 1 set out the rules and regulations and Tariff No. 2 established the toll for service (ESL Toll) on the line. In Tariff No. 2, the toll for uncommitted service (Uncommitted Toll) is twice the toll for committed service (Committed Toll). On 1 September 2010, Imperial Oil Limited submitted a complaint with respect to the ESL Toll. This report details the complaint filed by Imperial Oil, and presents the NEB's consideration of the market context and the justness of the Uncommitted Toll.--Includes text from document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Southern Lights GP on Behalf of Enbridge Southern Lights LP and Enbridge Pipelines Inc

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher: Canadian Museum of Civilization/Musee Canadien Des Civilisations

Published: 2008

Total Pages: 186

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

On 9 March 2007, Enbridge Southern Lights GP on behalf of Enbridge Southern Lights LP (ESL) and Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (EPI), collectively the Applicants, applied to the National Energy Board (NEB or the Board) for approvals related to the Southern Lights Project (Project). This Project consists of two components: Diluent Pipeline Project; and Capacity Replacement Project. In this proceeding, the Board heard evidence on engineering design and safety issues; economic considerations, such as supply and markets; public engagement and consultation; impacts on Aboriginal people; socio-economic and environmental effects of the Project; and land and routing matters.--Document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Pipelines Inc

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher: Canadian Museum of Civilization/Musee Canadien Des Civilisations

Published: 2008

Total Pages: 96

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

On 30 May 2007, Enbridge Pipelines Inc. (Enbridge or the Applicant) filed an application pursuant to section 52 of the National Energy Board Act (the NEB Act) for a Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity for the Alberta Clipper Expansion Project (Alberta Clipper or the Project). Under the NEB Act, the factors to be considered and the criteria to be applied in coming to a decision on public interest or the present and future public convenience and necessity may vary with the circumstances, including the application, the location, the commodity involved, the various segments of the public affected by the decision, societal values at the time, and the purpose of the applicable section of the NEB Act. The Board's decisions are made in the public interest and are based on respect for the rights of those affected, concern for the environment and a commitment to safety and security.--Document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Enbridge Bakken Pipeline Company Inc., on Behalf of Enbridge Bakken Pipeline Limited Partnership

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher:

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 138

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Having considered and weighed all of the evidence before it, the National Energy Board (NEB or the Board) finds that the Bakken Pipeline Project Canada (the Project), as proposed by Enbridge Bakken Pipeline Company Inc. (Enbridge Bakken), on behalf of Bakken Pipeline Limited Partnership, is and will be required by the present and future public convenience and necessity. This document includes the economic feasability, tolls and tariffs, facilities and emergency response matters, land matters, public consultation, aboriginal matters, and environmental and socio-economic matters.--Includes text from document.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of TransCanada Keystone Pipeline GP Ltd

Author: Canada. National Energy Board

Publisher:

Published: 2010

Total Pages: 170

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

On 27 February 2009, Keystone applied to the Board for a CPCN under section 52 of the National Energy Board Act (NEB Act or Act) authorizing Keystone to construct and operate the Keystone XL Pipeline, and for an approval pursuant to Part IV of the NEB Act for the toll methodology and tariff. The Keystone XL Pipeline Project consists of the construction of approximately 529 kilometres (km) of new 914 millimetre outside diameter (nominal pipe size 36 inch) pipeline from Hardisty, Alberta to Monchy, Saskatchewan. The Project will also include related physical works including: eight pump stations, storage tanks and other related works and activities including 32 mainline valves, cathodic protection for the pipeline, and pig launcher and receiver facilities. This report provides an overview of the matters considered by the Board in reaching a decision on the Application. Details of the Board's assessment of issues identified by the Board or by parties to the proceeding are set out in these Reasons. In coming to its findings, the Board considered all of the evidence on the record in this matter including economic feasibility, commercial impact, tolls and tariffs, engineering, land matters, Aboriginal concerns, environment and socio-economic matters, and the public interest.--Includes text from document.

Aboriginal Consultation, Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Review in Canada

Author: Kirk N. Lambrecht

Publisher: University of Regina Press

Published: 2013

Total Pages: 209

ISBN-13: 0889772983

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Supreme Court of Canada decisions have defined a general framework for the "duty to consult" Aboriginal peoples and accommodate their concerns over natural resource development, but anticipate the details of that framework will be expanded upon in the future. Aboriginal Consultation, Environmental Assessment, and Regulatory Review in Canada offers a paradigm that advances that discussion. It proposes an integrated and robust planning model for natural resource extraction allowing Aboriginal peoples, industry, governments, tribunals, and the Courts to all make contributions to reconciliation in the context of sustainable development and environmental protection. Kirk Lambrecht surveys the law of actual and asserted Aboriginal rights and historical and modern Treaty rights in Canada and discusses the national and international purposes of environmental assessment and regulatory review. He appraises the fundamental principles of Supreme Court of Canada jurisprudence defining aboriginal consultation and accommodation as a constitutional imperative and uses case studies involving the National Energy Board to demonstrate how integrated process has evolved over time. Finally he offers general conclusions on the practical utility, and outstanding challenges, involving an integrated planning paradigm.

From Recognition to Reconciliation

Author: Patrick Macklem

Publisher: University of Toronto Press

Published: 2016-01-01

Total Pages: 535

ISBN-13: 1442628855

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

In From Recognition to Reconciliation, twenty leading scholars reflect on the continuing transformation of the constitutional relationship between Indigenous peoples and the Canadian state.

Reasons for Decision in the Matter of Trans Mountain Pipeline ULC on Behalf of Trans Mountain Pipeline, L.P.

Author: Canada National Energy Board

Publisher:

Published: 2011

Total Pages: 64

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

On 29 November 2010, Trans Mountain applied to the National Energy Board, requesting approval of Firm Service on the Trans Mountain pipeline system with respect to certain capacity to the Westridge Marine Terminal. Trans Mountain also requested the approval of Tariff amendments to implement the Firm Service and for approval to use the Firm Service Fee as a customer contribution and the associated reporting of the collection and investment of the Firm Service Fees. Details of the Board's assessment of issues identified by the Board or by parties to the proceeding are set out in this document.--Includes text from document.