Inter-American Yearbook on Human Rights / Anuario Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, Volume 4 (1988)

Inter-American Yearbook on Human Rights / Anuario Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, Volume 4 (1988)

Author: Inter-American Commission on Human Rights

Publisher: BRILL

Published: 2022-08-08

Total Pages: 1191

ISBN-13: 9004470603

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This edition of the Inter-American Yearbook on Human Rights, like the volumes that precede it, includes information concerning the activities of the Organization of American States in the promotion and protection of human rights. It begins with the composition of the Commission and Court, including the biographies of the members, 1988 activities of each body, reproductions of resolutions and reports by the Commission and historic correspondences and decisions by the Court. Also included is an update on the status of the American Convention on Human Rights, which reports the relation of each country to that instrument, followed by resolutions adopted in 1988 by the OAS General Assembly. The year 1988 distinguished itself particularly because the Inter-American Court of Human Rights made its first decision on a contentious case, the Velásquez Rodríguez case (Honduras). This historic decision is reproduced in Part Three of this volume. Another important 1988 development in the Inter-American system was the Protocol of San Salvador, or Additional Protocol to the American Convention on Human Rights for Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, reproduced in Part Four. Also included, in its entirety, is a report on the human rights situation in Haiti, a report requested by the Organization of American States Permanent Council in Resolution 502. The Inter-American Yearbook on Human Rights is completely bilingual (English and Spanish).


¿QUOD EST, SUMMUS? ¿EN QUE QUEDAMOS, SUPREMO?

¿QUOD EST, SUMMUS? ¿EN QUE QUEDAMOS, SUPREMO?

Author: VIII QUORUM VIII

Publisher: Xlibris Corporation

Published: 2014-08-20

Total Pages: 298

ISBN-13: 1499058438

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

¿En que quedamos Supremo? La balanza de la justicia se inclina a favor o en contra, según se lo arrogue la ley y el derecho. La gente acude a los tribunales estatales y federales a resolver sus querellas y anhelan obtener justicia como una legitima aspiración consagrada en la Constitución y en la Carta de Derechos Civiles. Las sentencias que se dictan en los tribunales fundamentales, sea un fallo a favor o en contra, sera probidad para conformar una ulterior jurisprudencia. Así se ha construido el camino de la equidad y la justicia por siglos. En muchas ocasiones la balanza de la justicia se ha inclinado en contra de los derechos, sometiendo la justicia a intereses particulares, preferencias filosóficas y politicas, aun cuando el canon legal sea claro y evidente. ¿Cómo puede la ley ir en contra de la justicia? ¿Acaso la ley no invoca la justicia misma? ¿Adónde van a morir las demandas cuando los tribunales menores no interpretan acertadamente la ley? Al Tribunal Supremo de Justicia... Y siendo este el final del camino en busca de equilibrar la balanza. ¿En qué quedamos Supremo?