Hearing on the Reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965
Hearing on the Reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education

Publisher:

Published: 1992

Total Pages: 92

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

At this hearing, part of a series of hearings on the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965, the Secretary of the Department of Education, Lamar Alexander, gave testimony designed to present the Bush administration's recommendations on reauthorization of the Act to the Congress. Before the Secretary's testimony the following congressional Represntatives offered brief comments: E. Thomas Coleman of Missouri; Joseph M. Gaydos of Pennsylvania; William F. Goodling of Pennsylvania; William J. Jefferson of Louisiana; Marge Roukema of New Jersey; and Thomas C. Sawyer of Ohio. The Secretary then presented the administration's recommendations, a short verbal presentation followed by submission of a written report. The primary recommendations included targeting grants to lowest-income students, promoting greater accountability from individuals and institutions, improving the integrity of student loan services, establishing higher loan limits, improving outreach, expanding merit scholarships, and increasing teacher opportunities. There followed a lengthy discussion between the secretary and members of the committee. The prepared statement of Ron de Lugo, delegate to Congress from the Virgin Islands, is included. (JB)

Hearing on the Reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965
Hearing on the Reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education

Publisher:

Published: 1991

Total Pages: 236

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This hearing report, one of a series on the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965, contains testimony concerning Titles I, VI, and XI of that Act. Title I authorizes a series of programs designed to aid the nontraditional student. Title VI provides funds for fellowships, the establishment of national resource centers, language resource centers and business and international education programs. Title XI addresses partnerships for economic development and urban community service. This hearing consisted of two panels which included students and individuals from universities, national higher education associations, congressional representatives, and community colleges. The witnesses addressed the following issues: the needs of part-time and adult students, the internationalization of higher education, foreign language learning, study abroad, cooperative education programs, the needs of urban areas and the role that urban universities can play there, and educating the workforce. The prepared statements of the witnesses as well as supporting documents and supplemental materials are included. (JB)

Hearing on the Reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965
Hearing on the Reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Education and Labor. Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education

Publisher:

Published: 1991

Total Pages: 170

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The United States House of Representatives' Subcommittee on Postsecondary Education met in one of a series of hearings on the reauthorization of the Higher Education Act of 1965. This session heard testimony on: (1) Title III of the Act, addressing a program that provides aid to institutions of higher education which serve large numbers of disadvantaged students and that are in a weak financial condition; and (2) Title VIII, which provides aid to higher education institutions for establishing cooperative education programs. The discussion focused on strengthening institutions, historically black colleges and universities, a program of Endowment Challenge Grants, encouraging the training of minority teachers and professors, the varying mission and needs of community colleges versus four-year institutions, changes in the way the grants under the titles are administered, in particular a "wait out" period currently required before funds can be obtained, and issues surrounding the training of the work force of the future. Witnesses appeared representing professional education associations, community colleges and technical schools around the nation, historically black institutions of higher education and the Department of Education. The text contains testimony, prepared statements of the witnesses and statements of others who were not able to appear. (JB)