Graphic Versus Tote Display of Information in a Simulated Tactical Operations System
Author: Nawrocki, L H.
Publisher:
Published: 1973
Total Pages: 32
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: Nawrocki, L H.
Publisher:
Published: 1973
Total Pages: 32
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1975
Total Pages: 2834
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Superintendent of Documents
Publisher:
Published: 1976
Total Pages: 1408
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences
Publisher:
Published: 1973
Total Pages: 614
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1982
Total Pages: 268
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1975
Total Pages: 588
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Edgar M. Johnson
Publisher:
Published: 1981
Total Pages: 174
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Thomas M. Granda
Publisher:
Published: 1976
Total Pages: 40
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Reiner Huber
Publisher: Springer Science & Business Media
Published: 2013-11-11
Total Pages: 350
ISBN-13: 1475709587
DOWNLOAD EBOOKThis volume brings forth a set of selected papers from the Conference on Modeling Land Sattle Systems for Military Planning. Sponsored by the Special Programme Panel on Systems Science of the NATO Science Committee, the conference took place in Ottobrunn, Germany, at the War Gaming Centre of Industrieanlagen-Betriebsgesellschaft. The idea to organize a conference on land battle systemmodelswas first suggested to me in 1g72 by Andreas Mortensen, then a member of the Norwegian Defence Research Establishment and presently at the SHAPE Technical Centre, when we discussed the apparent inconsistencies of various evaluations of force capability within NATO. Frequently, decision makers are confronted by contradictory results of different studies addressing essentially the same problern leaving them with the impression that the tools of systems analysis and operations research may not be very objective guides. However, experienced systems researchers know that a detailed comparison of models, their assumptions and inputs, would generally show that results are not really contradictory. But not only seem the decision processes in large national and international organizations tobe suchthat a comparison can hardly ever be accomplished, also the docu mentation available is rarely sufficient to really camprehend the differences in results. For these reasons, we felt that an effort to review the state of the art of model ing in support of force capabil ity assessments was overdue.