Fifth Biennial Report Under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978 to the Governments of the United States and Canada and the State and Provincial Governments of the Great Lakes Basin
Fifth Biennial Report Under the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement of 1978 to the Governments of the United States and Canada and the State and Provincial Governments of the Great Lakes Basin

Author: International Joint Commission

Publisher:

Published: 1990

Total Pages: 68

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The International Joint Commission is required to report to the governments of Canada and the United Sates ate least biennially on its findings with respect to the implementation of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Normally the Commission's Biennial Reports made after each biennial Meeting reflect primarily the results of the Commission's consideration of the reports of its Great Lakes Water Quality and Great Lakes Science Advisory Boards for the two years since the preceding Biennial Report. This Biennial Report is also prepared with the benefit of having available to us the substantial and useful reports of these Boards. (...)on this occasion, the Report should also discuss specifically the input we have received from the public, and particularly the public input at the Biennial Meeting itself.

Advice to Governments on Their Review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement
Advice to Governments on Their Review of the Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement

Author: International Joint Commission

Publisher:

Published: 2006

Total Pages: 44

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Today, however, other concepts need to be incorporated into the Agreement so that it can facilitate contemporary efforts to protect and restore The purpose of the Agreement is to "restore and the water quality of the Great Lakes system and maintain" the water quality of the Great Lakes. [...] The following are four areas the Commission to the development of the Agreement in the 1970s suggests be considered for the purpose and scope and its amendment in 1987:. [...] For purposes of the Agreement, the Commission However, the Commission believes firmly that is of the view that a definition of the ecosystem adopting the ecosystem approach should not lead approach should be developed that is appropriate to to broadening the purpose of the Agreement. [...] This the objectives of the Agreement and the conditions means that the scope of the new Agreement - that in the basin. [...] Because the Commission basinwide consultations conducted by is recommending that the Agreement be endorsed the Commission, of the triennial progress by the U. S. Congress and the Parliament of reports under the Binational Action Plan, Canada, it is of the view that its role should be set out in a formal reference pursuant to Article IX of and (b) the Commission's independent the Boundary Waters Tr.