Unreliable real property data has been a long-standing problem for federal landholding agencies. Under the President¿s real property initiative, agencies are being held accountable for, among other things, improving the accuracy of their real property inventory and disposing of unneeded property. The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the fourth largest landholding agency, uses the Real Estate Management Information System (REMIS) for recording its civil works inventory. The author was asked to determine whether REMIS could provide reliable information on the Corps¿ civil works land disposals from FY 1996 through 2006. Includes recommendations. Charts and tables.
Many fed. agencies (FA) hold real property (RP) that they do not need. Some FA have been granted authorities to enter into enhanced use leases (EUL) -- long-term agree. with public and private entities for the use of fed. RP, resulting in cash and/or in-kind consideration for the FA -- or to retain the proceeds from the sale of RP. This report reviews how FA are using their disposal authorities: (1) what authorities the 10 largest RP holding FA have to enter into EULs and retain proceeds from the sale of RP; (2) the extent to which FA with authority to retain proceeds sold RP and how they used the proceeds; and (3) the relationship between FA having the authority to enter into EULs or retain sales proceeds and the amount of RP that they retained or sold.
Governments own a vast array of real property--from large stretches of land to public housing projects, from water distribution systems and roads to office buildings. Typically, management of public property is highly fragmented, with responsibility for each type of asset falling within a different agency or bureaucracy. In almost all countries, different classes of property are managed according to their own rules, often following traditional practices rather than any assessment of what type of management is appropriate. Over the past decade, however, a new discipline has emerged that examines this important component of public wealth and seeks to apply standards of economic efficiency and effective organizational management. Managing Government Property Assets reviews and analyzes this recent wave of activity. The authors draw upon a wide variety of national and local practices, both in countries that have been leaders in management reforms and in countries just beginning to wrestle with the problem. This comparison reveals that the issues of public property management are surprisingly similar in different countries, despite striking differences in institutional contexts and policy solutions.