Extending Authority for Executive Reorganization

Extending Authority for Executive Reorganization

Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Government Operations. Executive and Legislative Reorganization Subcommittee

Publisher:

Published: 1968

Total Pages: 32

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Considers H.R. 15688, to extend for another 4 years authority initially granted to the President in Reorganization Act of 1949 and subsequently codified in Title 5 of U.S. Code, to submit executive branch reorganization plans to Congress that are implemented after 60 days, unless House or Senate vetoes them by majority vote.


To Amend the Reorganization Act of 1949

To Amend the Reorganization Act of 1949

Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Government Operations. Subcommittee on Executive Reorganization

Publisher:

Published: 1965

Total Pages: 34

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Considers S. 1134 and S. 1135, to extend President's authority to transmit reorganization plans to Congress.


Executive Reorganization Authority

Executive Reorganization Authority

Author: David Michael Walker

Publisher:

Published: 2003

Total Pages:

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

GAO has sought to assist the Congress and the executive branch in considering the actions needed to support the transition to a more high performing, results-oriented, and accountable federal government. At the Committee's request, GAO provided perspective on the proposal to reinstate the authority for the President to submit government restructuring plans to the Congress for expedited review. In view of the overarching trends and the growing fiscal challenges facing our nation, there is a need to consider the proper role of the federal government, how the government should do business in the future, and in some instances, who should do the government's business in the 21st century. The fundamental issue raised by the proposal to grant reorganization authority to the President is not whether the government's organization can and should be restructured, but rather, whether and how the Congress wishes to change the nature of its normal deliberative process when addressing proposals to restructure the federal government. Given current trends and increasing fiscal challenges, a comprehensive review, reassessment, and reprioritization of what the government does and how it does it is clearly warranted. This is especially vital in view of changing priorities and the compelling need to examine the base of government programs, policies, and operations since, given GAO's long-term budget simulations, the status quo is unsustainable over time. While the intent of such a review is desirable and some expedited congressional consideration may well be appropriate for specific issues, the Congress also has an important role to play in government reform initiatives, especially from an authorization and oversight perspective. In contrast to the past "one-size-fits-all" approaches in developing new executive reorganization authority, the Congress may want to consider different tracks for proposals that propose significant policy changes versus those that focus more narrowly on government operations. Further, Congress may want to consider establishing appropriate processes to ensure the involvement of key players, particularly in the legislative and executive branches, to help facilitate reaching consensus on specific restructuring proposals that would be submitted for consideration, should the Congress enact a new executive reorganization authority. Modern management practices can provide a framework for developing successful restructuring proposals. Such practices include: establishing clear goals, following an integrated approach, developing an effective human capital strategy, considering alternative program delivery mechanisms, and planning for both initial and long-term implementation issues to achieve a successful transformation. Furthermore, successful implementation will depend in part on continuing congressional oversight. The Congress could significantly enhance its efficiency and effectiveness by adapting its own organization to mirror changes in the executive branch.


Power Shifts

Power Shifts

Author: John A. Dearborn

Publisher: University of Chicago Press

Published: 2021-09-10

Total Pages: 347

ISBN-13: 022679783X

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

"The extraordinary nature of the Trump presidency has spawned a resurgence in the study of the presidency and a rising concern about the power of the office. In Power Shifts: Congress and Presidential Representation, John Dearborn explores the development of the idea of the representative presidency, that the president alone is elected by a national constituency, and thus the only part of government who can represent the nation against the parochial concerns of members of Congress, and its relationship to the growth of presidential power in the 20th century. Dearborn asks why Congress conceded so much power to the Chief Executive, with the support of particularly conservative members of the Supreme Court. He discusses the debates between Congress and the Executive and the arguments offered by politicians, scholars, and members of the judiciary about the role of the president in the American state. He asks why so many bought into the idea of the representative, and hence, strong presidency despite unpopular wars, failed foreign policies, and parochial actions that favor only the president's supporters. This is a book about the power of ideas in the development of the American state"--


Executive Reorganization Authority

Executive Reorganization Authority

Author: United States Accounting Office (GAO)

Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform

Published: 2018-05-29

Total Pages: 36

ISBN-13: 9781720379706

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Executive Reorganization Authority: Balancing Executive and Congressional Roles in Shaping the Federal Government's Structure