Environmental Analysis of the Uranium Fuel Cycle: Supplementary analysis, 1976
Author: United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Radiation Programs
Publisher:
Published: 1973
Total Pages: 164
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Radiation Programs
Publisher:
Published: 1973
Total Pages: 164
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Environmental Protection Agency. Office of Radiation Programs
Publisher:
Published: 1976
Total Pages: 164
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 2011
Total Pages: 237
ISBN-13: 9780982800843
DOWNLOAD EBOOK"In this analysis we have presented a method that provides insight into future fuel cycle alternatives by clarifying the complexity of choosing an appropriate fuel cycle in the context of the distribution of burdens and benefits between generations. The current nuclear power deployment practices, together with three future fuel cycles were assessed."--Page 227.
Author: International Atomic Energy Agency
Publisher:
Published: 2005
Total Pages: 120
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKProvides a critical review of the thorium fuel cycle: potential benefits and challenges in the thorium fuel cycle, mainly based on the latest developments at the front end of the fuel cycle, applying thorium fuel cycle options, and at the back end of the thorium fuel cycle.
Author: United States. Environmental Protection Agency
Publisher:
Published: 1996
Total Pages: 896
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States. Energy Research and Development Administration
Publisher:
Published: 1977
Total Pages: 800
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: University of Oklahoma. Science and Public Policy Program
Publisher:
Published: 1979
Total Pages: 1050
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Yury Yudin
Publisher: UN
Published: 2009
Total Pages: 128
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKGlobal energy demands are driving a potential expansion in the use of nuclear energy worldwide. It is estimated that the global nuclear power capacity could double by 2030. This could result in dissemination of sensitive nuclear technologies that present obvious risks of proliferation. Certain international institutional mechanisms for controlling access to sensitive materials, facilities and technologies are needed for dealing with this problem. Over the past few years, 12 proposals have been put forward by states, nuclear industry and international organizations, aimed at checking the spread of uranium enrichment and spent fuel reprocessing technologies. This book presents an overview and analysis of these proposals, including an evaluation of the projected international mechanisms.
Author: National Research Council
Publisher: National Academies Press
Published: 2012-06-29
Total Pages: 424
ISBN-13: 0309255716
DOWNLOAD EBOOKIn the late 1980s, the National Cancer Institute initiated an investigation of cancer risks in populations near 52 commercial nuclear power plants and 10 Department of Energy nuclear facilities (including research and nuclear weapons production facilities and one reprocessing plant) in the United States. The results of the NCI investigation were used a primary resource for communicating with the public about the cancer risks near the nuclear facilities. However, this study is now over 20 years old. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission requested that the National Academy of Sciences provide an updated assessment of cancer risks in populations near USNRC-licensed nuclear facilities that utilize or process uranium for the production of electricity. Analysis of Cancer Risks in Populations near Nuclear Facilities: Phase 1 focuses on identifying scientifically sound approaches for carrying out an assessment of cancer risks associated with living near a nuclear facility, judgments about the strengths and weaknesses of various statistical power, ability to assess potential confounding factors, possible biases, and required effort. The results from this Phase 1 study will be used to inform the design of cancer risk assessment, which will be carried out in Phase 2. This report is beneficial for the general public, communities near nuclear facilities, stakeholders, healthcare providers, policy makers, state and local officials, community leaders, and the media.