New Jersey Federal Civil Procedure 2016

New Jersey Federal Civil Procedure 2016

Author: Robert E. Bartkus

Publisher: New Jersey Law Journal

Published: 2015-11-24

Total Pages: 0

ISBN-13: 9781628810189

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

Whether you go to federal court once a month or once a year, this is the perfect resource for you! New Jersey Federal Civil Procedure will now be issued as a one-volume annual paperback, giving readers current information in the easiest possible format. No more complicated stand-alone updates! This newly updated 2015 Edition is a useful, initial research tool that shares new discussions of cases and amended rules and statutes.Published annually in the Fall. Your purchase today includes this title in EPUB format. The eBook is viewable on Apple iPad or iPhone, SONY Reader, Barnes & Noble NOOK


Law at War, Vietnam, 1964-1973

Law at War, Vietnam, 1964-1973

Author: George Shipley Prugh

Publisher:

Published: 1975

Total Pages: 184

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

One of the first studies to examine exclusively the legal activities of judge advocates in Vietnam, focusing primarily on the U.S. Military Assistance Command (MACV).


Representing Yourself in Federal Court

Representing Yourself in Federal Court

Author: United States Disctrict Court

Publisher: Createspace Independent Publishing Platform

Published: 2017-08-04

Total Pages: 76

ISBN-13: 9781974174607

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

This Handbook is designed to help people dealing with civil lawsuits in federal court without legal representation. Proceeding without a lawyer is called proceeding "pro se1," a Latin phrase meaning "for oneself," or sometimes "in propria persona," meaning "in his or her own person." Representing yourself in a lawsuit can be complicated, time consuming, and costly. Failing to follow court procedures can mean losing your case. For these reasons, you are urged to work with a lawyer if possible. Chapter 2 gives suggestions on finding a lawyer. Do not rely entirely on this Handbook. This Handbook provides a summary of civil lawsuit procedures, but it may not cover all procedures that may apply in your case. It also does not teach you about the laws that will control your case. Make sure you read the applicable federal and local court rules and do your own research at a law library or online to understand your case. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California has Clerk's Offices in the San Francisco, San Jose and Oakland courthouses. Clerk's Office staff can answer general questions, but they cannot give you any legal advice. For example, they cannot help you decide what to do in your lawsuit, tell you what the law means, or even advise you when documents are due. There are Legal Help Centers in the San Francisco, Oakland and San Jose courthouses where you can get free help with your lawsuit from an attorney who can help you prepare documents and give limited legal advice. This attorney will not be your lawyer and you will still be representing yourself. See Chapter 2 for more details.


51 Imperfect Solutions

51 Imperfect Solutions

Author: Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton

Publisher: Oxford University Press

Published: 2018-05-07

Total Pages: 297

ISBN-13: 0190866063

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

When we think of constitutional law, we invariably think of the United States Supreme Court and the federal court system. Yet much of our constitutional law is not made at the federal level. In 51 Imperfect Solutions, U.S. Court of Appeals Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton argues that American Constitutional Law should account for the role of the state courts and state constitutions, together with the federal courts and the federal constitution, in protecting individual liberties. The book tells four stories that arise in four different areas of constitutional law: equal protection; criminal procedure; privacy; and free speech and free exercise of religion. Traditional accounts of these bedrock debates about the relationship of the individual to the state focus on decisions of the United States Supreme Court. But these explanations tell just part of the story. The book corrects this omission by looking at each issue-and some others as well-through the lens of many constitutions, not one constitution; of many courts, not one court; and of all American judges, not federal or state judges. Taken together, the stories reveal a remarkably complex, nuanced, ever-changing federalist system, one that ought to make lawyers and litigants pause before reflexively assuming that the United States Supreme Court alone has all of the answers to the most vexing constitutional questions. If there is a central conviction of the book, it's that an underappreciation of state constitutional law has hurt state and federal law and has undermined the appropriate balance between state and federal courts in protecting individual liberty. In trying to correct this imbalance, the book also offers several ideas for reform.