Apple Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Apple Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Tellabs Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Tellabs Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Eastman Kodak Company (Kodak) Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


General Electric Company (GE) Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

General Electric Company (GE) Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Hewlett-Packard Company (HP) Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Hewlett-Packard Company (HP) Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Pfizer Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Pfizer Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Oki Electric Industry Company Limited Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Oki Electric Industry Company Limited Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Praxair Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Praxair Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Quanta Computer Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Quanta Computer Inc Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.


Halliburton Company Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Halliburton Company Patent Landscape Analysis – January 1, 1994 to December 31, 2013

Author: Reiner E. Jargosch

Publisher: IPGenix LLC

Published: 2014-06-30

Total Pages: 52

ISBN-13:

DOWNLOAD EBOOK

The following analysis illustrates the underlying trends and relationships of U.S. issued patents of the subject company. The analysis employs two frequently used patent classification methods: US Patent Classification (UPC) and International Patent Classification (IPC). Aside from assisting patent examiners in determining the field of search for newly submitted patent applications, the two classification methods play a pivotal role in the characterization and analysis of technologies contained in collections of patent data. The analysis also includes the company’s most prolific inventors, top cited patents as well as foreign filings by technology area.