A Descriptive Report of Academic Departments in Higher Education Institutions
Author: Susan Higley Russell
Publisher:
Published: 1990
Total Pages: 124
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKRead and Download eBook Full
Author: Susan Higley Russell
Publisher:
Published: 1990
Total Pages: 124
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Susan Higley Russell
Publisher:
Published: 1991
Total Pages: 292
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Susan Higley Russell
Publisher:
Published: 1991
Total Pages: 296
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1990
Total Pages: 220
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: United States
Publisher:
Published: 2008
Total Pages: 432
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Sameer Y. Abraham
Publisher:
Published: 1994
Total Pages: 428
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor:
Publisher:
Published: 1992-04
Total Pages:
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Jack H. Schuster
Publisher: JHU Press
Published: 2008-12-15
Total Pages: 602
ISBN-13: 1421402076
DOWNLOAD EBOOKHigher education is becoming destabilized in the face of extraordinarily rapid change. The composition of the academy's most valuable asset—the faculty—and the essential nature of faculty work are being transformed. Jack H. Schuster and Martin J. Finkelstein describe the transformation of the American faculty in the most extensive and ambitious analysis of the American academic profession undertaken in a generation. A century ago the American research university emerged as a new organizational form animated by the professionalized, discipline-based scholar. The research university model persisted through two world wars and greatly varying economic conditions. In recent years, however, a new order has surfaced, organized around a globalized, knowledge-based economy, powerful privatization and market forces, and stunning new information technologies. These developments have transformed the higher education enterprise in ways barely imaginable in generations past. At the heart of that transformation, but largely invisible, has been a restructuring of academic appointments, academic work, and academic careers—a reconfiguring widely decried but heretofore inadequately described. This volume depicts the scope and depth of the transformation, combing empirical data drawn from three decades of national higher education surveys. The authors' portrait, at once startling and disturbing, provides the context for interpreting these developments as part of a larger structural evolution of the national higher education system. They outline the stakes for the nation and the challenging work to be done.
Author:
Publisher:
Published: 1992
Total Pages: 916
ISBN-13:
DOWNLOAD EBOOKAuthor: Lionel S. Lewis
Publisher: Routledge
Published: 2019-01-25
Total Pages: 162
ISBN-13: 1351292269
DOWNLOAD EBOOKIn the American university system for most of this century, the academic reward system has been blamed for both the neglect of teaching and a glut of uninspiring research. The salaries for faculty at institutions that place special emphasis on teaching are lower than those for faculty at institutions where both teaching and research are expected. In Marginal Worth, Lionel S. Lewis examines the contemporary academic labor market to explain why teaching—which is almost universally acknowledged both off and on campus to be at the center of the American educational experience—is not at the center of the academic labor market, and why it is only modestly rewarded. The evidence collected and analyzed by Lewis suggests that this is the case because teaching is not a particularly productive activity, and its quality is hard to measure. Teaching does not generate automatic prestige, most students do not learn a great deal, and in many instances other matters absorb the attention of faculty. Fifteen anonymous academic administrators and faculty members from around the country provided Lewis with the many letters, reports, and other documents he used in his analysis. By examining the material justifying merit salary awards, he reveals how merit is defined in academia. The focus of the letters is on teaching, research, administration, and service; teaching is not always seen as central to the academic role. For several years and from all sides, American institutions of higher learning have been called to account for a variety of failures. Significantly, the one indictment most often heard is that classrooms have been abandoned for laboratories and libraries, where faculty pursue interests to further their careers. Lewis argues that restoring the balance between teaching and research is too simple a solution to the problem. We need to better understand how disciplinary and institutional reward structures affect teaching, how and why faculty allocate their tune, and why teaching appears to be neglected and underappreciated. Lewis applies tenets of the neoclassical labor market model to the academy, and considers what might be done to strike a better balance between expectations and circumstances in the academic marketplace. This candid look into the political economy of higher education will be enlightening reading for all concerned with the future of American higher education: professors, administrators, students, and parents.